Translate

Saturday, 12 July 2014

Describing Line Graphs



Describing Line Graphs (1)
Look at the following simple line graph: 

 
It shows the population of Denmark from 1996 to 2007. You can see that in 1996 the population was 5.25 million and that by the year 2007 it had grown to 5.45 million.
When you write about a line chart it is important to look first at the Chart Title. This tells you what information the graph displays and you can use this information in your description.
Then look at the X and Y axes. The titles of these axes sometimes give you information you can use in your description. It is important also to look at the UNITS. On the Y-axis in this graph the units are millions. The population of Denmark in 1996 was not 5.25, but 5.25 million people.
Line graphs describe change. When describing these graphs you must answer the question, "What changed?". In this case we can see that the population of Denmark increased from 1996 to 2007.
We can also ask the question, "How did the population change?". Because the line is fairly smooth, we can say that the population increased steadily.
Lastly, we can ask the question, "How much?". In this case, "How big was the change in population?" The population in 1996 was 5.25 million and in 2007 it was 2.45 million. So there was an increase of 0.2 million or 200,000 people. 

To write a short description of this graph ask yourself (and answer!) the following questions:
  1. What exactly does the graph show? (Use the chart title to help you answer this question)
  2. What are the axes and what are the units?
  3. What changed?
  4. How much did it change?
Answering these questions will help you to write a short description of this simple graph.
Here is an example:

This graph shows population change in Denmark from 1996 to 2007. Denmark's population grew steadily from 5.25 million in 1996 to 5.45 million in 2007, an increase of 200,000 people.

Vocabulary
Other words you can use instead of increased or grew are rose and went up.
Adverbs you can use with these words are:


How?
How much?
increased
dramatically, significantly, considerably, rapidly, substantially, steadily, sharply, markedly, greatly, slightly, exponentially, proportionally, strongly
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y, tenfold, fourfold ...
grew
rapidly, steadily, slowly, gradually, dramatically, substantially, enormously, quickly
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y
rose
sharply, slowly, steadily, slightly, rapidly, quickly, dramatically, significantly, substantially, gently, fractionally, considerably, gradually
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y
went up
The above adverbs are not usually used with "went up".
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y



Describing Line Graphs (2)
Look at the following simple line graph: 

It shows the population of Hungary from 1996 to 2007. You can see that in 1996 the population was more than 10.3 million and that by the year 2007 it had fallen to just over 10.05 million.
What change is shown by this graph? In this case we can see that the population of Hungary decreased from 1996 to 2007.
Also in this graph the line is fairly smooth, so we can say that the population decreased steadily.
How big was the change in population? The population in 1996 was 10.32 million and in 2007 it was 10.07 million. So there was a decrease of 0.25 million or 250,000 people. 


To write a short description of this graph ask yourself (and answer!) the following questions:
  1. What exactly does the graph show? (Use the chart title to help you answer this question)
  2. What are the axes and what are the units?
  3. What changed?
  4. How much did it change?
Answering these questions will help you to write a short description of this simple graph.
Here is an example:
This graph shows population change in Hungary from 1996 to 2007. Hungary's population fell steadily from 10.32 million in 1996 to 10.07 million in 2007, a decrease of 250,000 people.

Vocabulary
Other words you can use instead of fell or decreased are declined, dropped and went down .
Adverbs you can use with these words are:


How?
How much?
fell
sharply, heavily, slightly, steadily, dramatically, significantly, considerably, quickly, rapidly, steeply, gradually, gently, substantially, precipitately, fractionally, drastically, marginally, markedly, progressively, continuously
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y, tenfold, fourfold ...
decreased
significantly, markedly, slightly, steadily, rapidly, considerably, continuously, dramatically,
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y, tenfold, fourfold ...
declined
sharply, rapidly, dramatically, steadily, slightly, markedly, significantly, considerably, steeply, drastically, continuously, substantially, quickly
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y
dropped
dramatically, sharply, slightly, considerably, steadily, significantly, rapidly, drastically, alarmingly, noticeably, markedly, radically, abruptly, substantially, gradually, gently, slowly
by X% (by X per cent), by X (units), from X to Y
went down
The above adverbs are not usually used with "went down ".




Describing Line Graphs (3) - Using Adverbs
The following graphs illustrate the use of some adverbs: 

 
  • The population rose slowly. (small increase in the population over the period)
  • The population rose steadily. (little or no variation in the rate of growth)
  • The population rose slightly. (small increase in the population over the period)
  • The population rose gently. (small increase in the population over the period)
  • The population rose gradually. (small increase in the population over the period)

  • From 1996 to 1998, the population increased dramatically.
  • From 1996 to 1998, the population increased significantly.

No comments: